Blog Details

In GaN-based light-emitting diodes (LEDs), continuous advances in epitaxial growth and device design have pushed the internal quantum efficiency (IQE) close to its theoretical limit. However, the overall luminous efficiency of LEDs remains fundamentally constrained by light extraction efficiency (LEE). As sapphire remains the dominant substrate material for GaN epitaxy, its surface structure plays a critical role in determining optical losses. This article provides an in-depth comparison between flat sapphire substrates and patterned sapphire substrates (PSS), explaining how PSS improves light extraction efficiency through well-established optical and crystallographic mechanisms, and why it has become a de facto standard in high-performance LED manufacturing.

1. Why Light Extraction Efficiency Limits LED Performance

The total external quantum efficiency (EQE) of an LED is governed by the product of two key factors:

EQE=IQE×LEE

While IQE reflects how efficiently electrons and holes recombine to generate photons inside the active region, LEE describes how effectively those photons escape the device.

In GaN-based LEDs grown on sapphire substrates, LEE is typically limited to 30–40% in conventional designs. The primary reasons include:

• Severe refractive index mismatch between GaN (n ≈ 2.4), sapphire (n ≈ 1.7), and air (n ≈ 1.0)

• Total internal reflection (TIR) at flat interfaces

• Photon trapping within the epitaxial layers and substrate

As a result, a large fraction of generated photons undergo multiple reflections and are eventually absorbed or converted into heat rather than useful light.

2. Flat Sapphire Substrates: Structural Simplicity, Optical Limitations

2.1 Structural Characteristics

Flat sapphire substrates feature a smooth, planar surface, typically with a c-plane (0001) orientation. They have been widely used due to:

• High crystalline quality

• Excellent thermal and chemical stability

• Mature, cost-effective manufacturing processes

2.2 Optical Behavior

From an optical perspective, flat interfaces introduce predictable and highly directional photon propagation paths. When photons generated in the GaN active region reach the GaN–air or GaN–sapphire interface at angles exceeding the critical angle, total internal reflection occurs.

Consequences include:

• Photon confinement within the device

• Increased absorption by electrodes and defects

• Limited angular distribution of emitted light

In essence, flat sapphire substrates provide minimal assistance in overcoming optical confinement.

3. Patterned Sapphire Substrate (PSS): Concept and Structure

A Patterned Sapphire Substrate (PSS) is created by introducing periodic or quasi-periodic micro- or nano-scale structures onto the sapphire surface through photolithography and etching processes.

Common PSS geometries include:

• Conical structures

• Hemispherical domes

• Pyramids

• Cylindrical or truncated cones

Typical feature sizes range from sub-micron to several micrometers, with carefully controlled height, pitch, and duty cycle.

4. How PSS Improves Light Extraction Efficiency

4.1 Suppression of Total Internal Reflection

The three-dimensional topology of PSS alters the local angle of incidence at interfaces. Photons that would otherwise undergo total internal reflection at a flat boundary are redirected into angles within the escape cone.

This significantly increases the probability of photons exiting the device.

4.2 Enhanced Optical Scattering and Path Randomization

PSS structures introduce multiple refraction and reflection events, leading to:

• Directional randomization of photon trajectories

• Increased interaction with escape interfaces

• Reduced photon residence time inside the device

Statistically, this improves the likelihood of photon extraction before absorption occurs.

4.3 Effective Refractive Index Grading

From an optical modeling perspective, PSS behaves as an effective refractive index transition layer. Instead of an abrupt change from GaN to air, the patterned region creates a gradual refractive index variation, reducing Fresnel reflection losses.

This mechanism is conceptually similar to anti-reflective coatings but operates through geometric optics rather than thin-film interference.

4.4 Indirect Reduction of Optical Absorption Losses

By shortening photon path lengths and reducing repeated reflections, PSS lowers the probability of absorption by:

• Metal contacts

• Defect states

• Free carrier absorption in GaN

This contributes to both higher efficiency and improved thermal behavior.

5. Additional Benefits: Crystal Quality Improvement

Beyond optics, PSS also improves epitaxial quality through lateral epitaxial overgrowth (LEO) mechanisms:

• Dislocations originating at the sapphire–GaN interface are redirected or terminated

• Threading dislocation density is reduced

• Improved material quality enhances device reliability and lifetime

This dual benefit—optical and structural—distinguishes PSS from purely optical surface treatments.

6. Quantitative Comparison: PSS vs. Flat Sapphire Substrate

Actual performance gains depend on pattern geometry, wavelength, chip design, and packaging.

7. Trade-offs and Engineering Considerations

Despite its advantages, PSS introduces practical challenges:

• Additional lithography and etching steps increase cost

• Pattern uniformity and etch depth must be tightly controlled

• Suboptimal pattern designs may negatively impact epitaxial uniformity

Therefore, PSS optimization is a multidisciplinary task involving optical modeling, epitaxial growth, and device engineering.

8. Industry Perspective and Future Outlook

Today, PSS is no longer considered an optional enhancement. In medium- and high-power LED applications—including general lighting, automotive lighting, and display backlighting—it has become a baseline technology.

Looking forward:

• Advanced PSS designs are being explored for Mini LED and Micro LED

• Hybrid approaches combining PSS with photonic crystals or nano-texturing are under investigation

• Cost reduction and pattern scalability remain key industry goals

Conclusion

Patterned Sapphire Substrates represent a fundamental shift from passive support materials to functional optical and structural components in LED devices. By addressing light extraction losses at their root—optical confinement and interface reflection—PSS enables higher efficiency, improved reliability, and better performance consistency.

In contrast, flat sapphire substrates, while manufacturable and economical, are inherently limited in their ability to support next-generation high-efficiency LEDs. As LED technology continues to evolve, PSS stands as a clear example of how materials engineering directly translates into system-level performance gains.