Silicon carbide (SiC) substrates have become a cornerstone material for next-generation electronics, enabling devices that operate at higher voltages, higher temperatures, and higher efficiencies than traditional silicon-based technologies. As SiC adoption accelerates across power electronics, RF communication, and emerging quantum and sensing fields, substrate selection has become a critical early design decision.
Among the most commonly used SiC substrate types, N-type conductive SiC and High-Purity Semi-Insulating (HPSI) SiC serve very different purposes. Although they may look similar in terms of crystal structure and surface finish, their electrical behavior, defect tolerance, and target applications differ fundamentally.
This article provides a clear, application-driven comparison of N-type and HPSI SiC substrates, helping engineers, researchers, and purchasing teams make informed decisions based on device requirements rather than marketing terminology.
![]()
Before comparing N-type and HPSI SiC, it is useful to clarify what they have in common.
Most commercial SiC substrates are:
Single-crystal materials grown by Physical Vapor Transport (PVT)
Typically 4H-SiC polytype, due to its superior electron mobility and band structure
Available in diameters from 4 inch to 8 inch, with 6 inch currently dominating mass production
The key differentiator between substrate types lies not in the crystal lattice, but in intentional impurity control and electrical resistivity.
N-type SiC substrates are intentionally doped with donor impurities, most commonly nitrogen (N). These dopants introduce free electrons into the crystal lattice, making the substrate electrically conductive.
Typical properties:
Resistivity: ~0.01–0.1 Ω·cm
Majority carriers: Electrons
Conductive behavior: Stable over a wide temperature range
In many power and optoelectronic devices, the substrate is not merely a mechanical support. It also serves as:
A current conduction path
A thermal dissipation channel
A reference electrical potential
N-type substrates enable vertical device architectures where current flows through the substrate itself, simplifying device design and improving reliability.
HPSI SiC (High-Purity Semi-Insulating SiC) is engineered to have extremely high resistivity, typically greater than 10⁷–10⁹ Ω·cm. Instead of adding donors, manufacturers carefully balance residual impurities and intrinsic defects to suppress free carriers.
This is achieved through:
Ultra-low background doping
Compensation between donors and acceptors
Strict control of crystal growth conditions
Unlike N-type substrates, HPSI SiC is designed to block current flow. Its value lies in providing:
Electrical isolation
Low parasitic conduction
Stable RF performance at high frequencies
In RF and microwave devices, unwanted substrate conductivity directly degrades device efficiency and signal integrity.
| Parameter | N-Type SiC | HPSI SiC |
|---|---|---|
| Typical Resistivity | 0.01–0.1 Ω·cm | >10⁷ Ω·cm |
| Electrical Role | Conductive | Insulating |
| Dominant Carrier | Electrons | Suppressed |
| Substrate Function | Current path + heat sink | Electrical isolation |
| Common Polytype | 4H-SiC | 4H-SiC |
| Cost Level | Lower | Higher |
| Growth Complexity | Moderate | High |
Typical devices:
SiC MOSFETs
Schottky Barrier Diodes (SBD)
PiN diodes
Power modules for EVs and charging infrastructure
Why N-type works best:
Supports vertical current flow
Enables low on-resistance
Offers excellent thermal conductivity for heat dissipation
Using HPSI SiC in power devices would introduce unnecessary electrical resistance and complicate device design.
Verdict:
N-Type SiC is the industry standard for power electronics
Typical devices:
GaN-on-SiC RF HEMTs
Microwave power amplifiers
Radar and satellite communication components
Why HPSI is critical:
Minimizes RF signal loss into the substrate
Reduces parasitic capacitance
Improves gain, linearity, and power efficiency
In RF applications, even slight substrate conductivity can lead to performance degradation at high frequencies.
Verdict:
HPSI SiC is the preferred choice for RF and microwave systems
Applications such as:
UV photodetectors
High-temperature sensors
Specialized optoelectronic structures
may use either N-type or semi-insulating substrates, depending on:
Device architecture
Signal-to-noise requirements
Integration with other materials
In these cases, substrate choice is often determined at the epitaxy and circuit design stage, rather than by the substrate alone.
From a manufacturing perspective, both substrate types must meet strict quality requirements:
Low micropipe density
Controlled basal plane dislocations (BPD)
Uniform resistivity and thickness
However, HPSI substrates are more sensitive to growth defects, as unintended carriers can drastically reduce resistivity. This leads to:
Lower overall yield
Higher inspection and qualification costs
Higher final price
N-type substrates, by contrast, tolerate certain defect levels more easily in high-volume production environments.
While pricing varies by wafer size and grade, general trends hold:
N-type SiC:
More mature supply chain
Higher production volumes
Lower cost per wafer
HPSI SiC:
Limited qualified suppliers
Stricter growth control
Higher cost and longer lead times
For commercial projects, these factors often influence substrate selection as much as technical performance.
A practical decision framework:
Is current meant to flow through the substrate?
→ Yes → N-type SiC
Is electrical isolation critical for device performance?
→ Yes → HPSI SiC
Is the application RF, microwave, or high-frequency?
→ Almost always → HPSI SiC
Is cost sensitivity high with large production volume?
→ Likely → N-type SiC
N-type and HPSI SiC substrates are not competing alternatives, but purpose-built materials optimized for fundamentally different device requirements. N-type SiC enables efficient power conduction and thermal management, making it indispensable for power electronics. HPSI SiC, by contrast, provides the electrical isolation necessary for high-frequency and RF applications where signal integrity is paramount.
Understanding these distinctions at the substrate level helps prevent costly redesigns later in the development cycle and ensures that material choices align with long-term performance, reliability, and scalability goals.
In SiC technology, the right substrate is not the best one available — it is the one best matched to your application.
Silicon carbide (SiC) substrates have become a cornerstone material for next-generation electronics, enabling devices that operate at higher voltages, higher temperatures, and higher efficiencies than traditional silicon-based technologies. As SiC adoption accelerates across power electronics, RF communication, and emerging quantum and sensing fields, substrate selection has become a critical early design decision.
Among the most commonly used SiC substrate types, N-type conductive SiC and High-Purity Semi-Insulating (HPSI) SiC serve very different purposes. Although they may look similar in terms of crystal structure and surface finish, their electrical behavior, defect tolerance, and target applications differ fundamentally.
This article provides a clear, application-driven comparison of N-type and HPSI SiC substrates, helping engineers, researchers, and purchasing teams make informed decisions based on device requirements rather than marketing terminology.
![]()
Before comparing N-type and HPSI SiC, it is useful to clarify what they have in common.
Most commercial SiC substrates are:
Single-crystal materials grown by Physical Vapor Transport (PVT)
Typically 4H-SiC polytype, due to its superior electron mobility and band structure
Available in diameters from 4 inch to 8 inch, with 6 inch currently dominating mass production
The key differentiator between substrate types lies not in the crystal lattice, but in intentional impurity control and electrical resistivity.
N-type SiC substrates are intentionally doped with donor impurities, most commonly nitrogen (N). These dopants introduce free electrons into the crystal lattice, making the substrate electrically conductive.
Typical properties:
Resistivity: ~0.01–0.1 Ω·cm
Majority carriers: Electrons
Conductive behavior: Stable over a wide temperature range
In many power and optoelectronic devices, the substrate is not merely a mechanical support. It also serves as:
A current conduction path
A thermal dissipation channel
A reference electrical potential
N-type substrates enable vertical device architectures where current flows through the substrate itself, simplifying device design and improving reliability.
HPSI SiC (High-Purity Semi-Insulating SiC) is engineered to have extremely high resistivity, typically greater than 10⁷–10⁹ Ω·cm. Instead of adding donors, manufacturers carefully balance residual impurities and intrinsic defects to suppress free carriers.
This is achieved through:
Ultra-low background doping
Compensation between donors and acceptors
Strict control of crystal growth conditions
Unlike N-type substrates, HPSI SiC is designed to block current flow. Its value lies in providing:
Electrical isolation
Low parasitic conduction
Stable RF performance at high frequencies
In RF and microwave devices, unwanted substrate conductivity directly degrades device efficiency and signal integrity.
| Parameter | N-Type SiC | HPSI SiC |
|---|---|---|
| Typical Resistivity | 0.01–0.1 Ω·cm | >10⁷ Ω·cm |
| Electrical Role | Conductive | Insulating |
| Dominant Carrier | Electrons | Suppressed |
| Substrate Function | Current path + heat sink | Electrical isolation |
| Common Polytype | 4H-SiC | 4H-SiC |
| Cost Level | Lower | Higher |
| Growth Complexity | Moderate | High |
Typical devices:
SiC MOSFETs
Schottky Barrier Diodes (SBD)
PiN diodes
Power modules for EVs and charging infrastructure
Why N-type works best:
Supports vertical current flow
Enables low on-resistance
Offers excellent thermal conductivity for heat dissipation
Using HPSI SiC in power devices would introduce unnecessary electrical resistance and complicate device design.
Verdict:
N-Type SiC is the industry standard for power electronics
Typical devices:
GaN-on-SiC RF HEMTs
Microwave power amplifiers
Radar and satellite communication components
Why HPSI is critical:
Minimizes RF signal loss into the substrate
Reduces parasitic capacitance
Improves gain, linearity, and power efficiency
In RF applications, even slight substrate conductivity can lead to performance degradation at high frequencies.
Verdict:
HPSI SiC is the preferred choice for RF and microwave systems
Applications such as:
UV photodetectors
High-temperature sensors
Specialized optoelectronic structures
may use either N-type or semi-insulating substrates, depending on:
Device architecture
Signal-to-noise requirements
Integration with other materials
In these cases, substrate choice is often determined at the epitaxy and circuit design stage, rather than by the substrate alone.
From a manufacturing perspective, both substrate types must meet strict quality requirements:
Low micropipe density
Controlled basal plane dislocations (BPD)
Uniform resistivity and thickness
However, HPSI substrates are more sensitive to growth defects, as unintended carriers can drastically reduce resistivity. This leads to:
Lower overall yield
Higher inspection and qualification costs
Higher final price
N-type substrates, by contrast, tolerate certain defect levels more easily in high-volume production environments.
While pricing varies by wafer size and grade, general trends hold:
N-type SiC:
More mature supply chain
Higher production volumes
Lower cost per wafer
HPSI SiC:
Limited qualified suppliers
Stricter growth control
Higher cost and longer lead times
For commercial projects, these factors often influence substrate selection as much as technical performance.
A practical decision framework:
Is current meant to flow through the substrate?
→ Yes → N-type SiC
Is electrical isolation critical for device performance?
→ Yes → HPSI SiC
Is the application RF, microwave, or high-frequency?
→ Almost always → HPSI SiC
Is cost sensitivity high with large production volume?
→ Likely → N-type SiC
N-type and HPSI SiC substrates are not competing alternatives, but purpose-built materials optimized for fundamentally different device requirements. N-type SiC enables efficient power conduction and thermal management, making it indispensable for power electronics. HPSI SiC, by contrast, provides the electrical isolation necessary for high-frequency and RF applications where signal integrity is paramount.
Understanding these distinctions at the substrate level helps prevent costly redesigns later in the development cycle and ensures that material choices align with long-term performance, reliability, and scalability goals.
In SiC technology, the right substrate is not the best one available — it is the one best matched to your application.